Tag Archives: Negotiable Instruments Act

Dashrath Requires a Second Read; Goodbye, Mr. Lodha!

By Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Senior Associate In our post entitled “The Territorial Jurisdiction Conundrum”, we discussed how the Division Bench, in Dashrath, cleverly interpreted the “Harman Approach” and its effect on the “Bhaskaran Ratio”. It was fairly concluded by the … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

… And we are back (with more Case Laws)

By Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Senior Associate After a long summer holiday we are back again at the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“SC”). As we gear up to write more, analyze more and criticize even more – here are two … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

A Legally Enforceable Debt u/s. 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

By Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Senior Associate A person is deemed to have committed an offence, within the meaning of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (“Act”) when any cheque drawn by him, on an account maintained by him … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Cognizance of Offences” under Section 142 (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act: A Brief Comment on ECON Antri Ltd. v. Rom Industries Ltd. and Anr.

By Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Associate A person is deemed to have committed an offence, within the meaning of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (“Act”), when any cheque drawn by him, on an account maintained by him with … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

4 Days, 7 Judges, 5 Judgments

By Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Associate The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India (“SC”) has pronounced five very notable judgments in the four working days between the dates 22.8.2013 and 27.8.2013. Though all of them deserve equal and exclusive attention – it … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment