- Follow Rohit Das & Associates on WordPress.com
Follow RDA Legal on TwitterMy Tweets
Tags1996 2002 2012 2013 Automatic Route banking Banking & Finance Bombay High Court Capital Markets CCI Cheque Bounce Cheques Companies Act 1956 Compensation Competition Act Competition Appellate Tribunal Competition Commission of India Constitution of India Debt Delhi High Court Dishonour ECB External Commercial Borrowings FDI FII FIPB Foreign Direct Investment Foreign Institutional Investors Foreign Venture Capital Investors FVCI Hon’ble Supreme Court of India ICDR IDF Indian Penal Code Infrastructure Insufficiency of Funds Insurance Insurance Act 1938 Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority Act 1999 IPC IPO IRDA M&A Mergers & Acquisitions Multi-Brand Retail National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NBFC Negotiable Instruments Act Negotiable Instruments Act 1881 NI Act Non-Banking Finance Companies Pension Funds Pensions Act 1871 PPP Projects Public Issue Public Private Partnership RBI Reserve Bank of India SAT SCRA SEBI Section 138 Section 302 Securities & Exchange Board of India Securities and Exchange Board of India (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations 2009 Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act 1956 Securities Markets Self Certified Syndicate Banks Supreme Court of India Telecom Telecommunications UCB Urban Cooperative Bank
Monthly Archives: September 2013
By Anupam Prasad, Partner & Amit Das, Associate The Securities and Exchange Board of India (“SEBI”) notified amendments to the SEBI (Alternate Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (“AIF Regulations”) on September 16, 2013 (“AIF Amendment”) The AIF Amendment introduces the regulatory … Continue reading
By Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Associate In some states of the United States of America, presumably seven in all, a wife can sue “the other woman” (for her wrongful and malicious acts towards stealing the husband) in an ‘alienation of affection’ … Continue reading
“Cognizance of Offences” under Section 142 (b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act: A Brief Comment on ECON Antri Ltd. v. Rom Industries Ltd. and Anr.
By Rudrajyoti Nath Ray, Associate A person is deemed to have committed an offence, within the meaning of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (“Act”), when any cheque drawn by him, on an account maintained by him with … Continue reading